Every AI visibility tool gives you a score.
| ● Missing | Top 10 field service management software 2026ifs.com | 27 / 48 | editor@… |
| ● Missing | 9 best field service management software of 2026zendesk.com | 26 / 48 | contact form |
| ● No route | Best Field Service Management Software | Capterracapterra.com | 19 / 48 | — |
| ● Buried | Best Field Service Management Software | FieldCampfieldcamp.ai | 13 / 48 | position 7 |
You already know you're losing AI answers.
Nobody will tell you where.
We don't measure the answer.
We find where the answer came from.
From “we're invisible” to “here's who to email”
We ask the engines the questions your buyers ask — discovery, pricing, comparison, alternatives, evaluation — many times over, and record which pages they retrieve from.
Pages rank by how many independent runs cited them, using the lower bound of the citation rate. One lucky hit in three runs never outranks a page cited twenty times in forty.
Every page checked for your brand. Where you're missing, who's there instead, where you sit if you are there, and the contact route to change it.
Built to survive the question
“where did that number come from”
Every figure is a count against a stated denominator. Nothing is a percentage with an invisible bottom half.
Pages sort by the lower bound of their citation rate, so small-sample flukes can't top the list in front of a client.
Whether we found someone to email is a separate column. The gap is never quietly understated.
Pages we couldn't read are counted and shown.
Any number in any report replays back to the exact prompt that produced it.
Self-contained HTML, light and dark, your logo on it.
Built for the people who have to explain it on Monday
One workspace per client, white-label output, a worklist you can assign to a junior instead of a chart you have to interpret.
The answer to “why aren't we showing up in ChatGPT” that survives the follow-up question.
Find the ten pages that decide your category and go get on them.
Leave this row out entirely until you have real logos and written permission. An empty or faked trust bar costs more credibility than no trust bar.
The ones you're actually asking
Honestly? For most businesses, not as much as the noise suggests. AI referrals are roughly 0.32% of website traffic — Google organic is still about 43%. Anyone telling you AI search has replaced SEO is selling something.
What’s changed is that AI answers increasingly shape the shortlist before the click. If you’re in a considered-purchase category where buyers research first, being absent from the pages that feed those answers costs you before you ever see it in analytics. If you sell impulse purchases to people who don’t research, spend your money elsewhere. We’d rather tell you that now than sell you a subscription you don’t need.
They measure how often you appear in answers. We find the pages those answers come from, and tell you which ones don’t mention you. One produces a chart. The other produces a to-do list. Plenty of people buy both.
They do, and that’s the point. We don’t measure the answers — we measure which pages the engines retrieve from, which is far more stable. And we always show the count and the denominator, so you can judge the strength yourself instead of trusting our arithmetic.
No, and be careful with anyone who does. Ahrefs ran a test where pages given standard “AI optimisation” treatment were cited less than untouched controls. What we can tell you is which pages the engines are actually reading and whether your name is on them. Getting onto those pages is ordinary editorial and PR work — real, doable, and not magic.
[FILL — state exactly what you have wired and nothing more.]
Being straight with you: ChatGPT drives around 75% of AI referral traffic, so the nine-engine claims you see elsewhere matter less than they sound. We’d rather sample fewer engines properly than list nine and sample them all badly.
Partly. AI answers for local queries vary by where the question is asked from, and we don’t yet vary location properly. Until we do, treat local results as indicative. We’d rather say that than take your money for a number we don’t trust.